IWV vs. DBO
IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWV returned 14.85%/yr vs 10.89%/yr for DBO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
IWV vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWV achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IWV has outperformed DBO with an annualized return of 14.85%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.89% annualized return.
IWV
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.85%
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
IWV vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 11.36% | 16.96% | 23.49% | 25.82% | -19.28% | 25.54% | 20.55% | 30.66% | -5.43% | 20.97% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | -20.99% | 28.05% | -15.22% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWV and DBO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007 | 0.30 |
The correlation between IWV and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWV vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWV
DBO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
IWV
DBO
-
Financial Services
IWV
DBO
Communication Services
IWV
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWV
DBO
-
Industrials
IWV
DBO
-
Healthcare
IWV
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
IWV
DBO
-
Energy
IWV
DBO
-
Real Estate
IWV
DBO
-
Utilities
IWV
DBO
-
Basic Materials
IWV
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWV vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
IWV
DBO
IWV vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 4.28 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.64 | 8.69 | +5.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.25 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.48 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.34 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.02 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
IWV vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -90.18% | +34.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -18.19% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -28.20% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -37.68% | +12.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.22% | -61.69% | +26.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -52.68% | +52.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.59% | -62.25% | +51.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 8.94% | -7.01% |
Volatility
IWV vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is 2.91%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that IWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 12.79% | -9.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 28.32% | -19.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 34.58% | -22.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 32.31% | -15.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 31.79% | -13.39% |
IWV vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWV vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than DBO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWV and DBO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to IWV (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWV dropped -55.61% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 10-year performance, IWV leads with 14.85% vs 10.89% for DBO. On fees, IWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWV has performed better with a 14.85% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.85% for IWV.
IWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. IWV tracks Russell 3000 Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWV and 0.78% for DBO.
IWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWV and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer