PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. VOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than VOE's 11.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWS having a 10.56% annualized return and VOE not far ahead at 10.96%.


IWS

1D
-1.08%
1M
2.64%
YTD
15.78%
6M
14.47%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
10.56%

VOE

1D
0.12%
1M
1.41%
YTD
11.74%
6M
10.93%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
10.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.78%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
11.74%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and VOE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006

0.98

The correlation between IWS and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWS vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
VOE

Technology

18.7%
11.4%

Industrials

16.2%
13.6%

Financial Services

13.7%
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
6.2%

Real Estate

8.3%
5.6%

Healthcare

7.6%
6.4%

Energy

7.4%
12.3%

Utilities

6.6%
11.6%

Basic Materials

5.3%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
7.9%

Communication Services

3.1%
2.1%

Technology

IWS
18.7%
VOE
11.4%

Industrials

IWS
16.2%
VOE
13.6%

Financial Services

IWS
13.7%
VOE
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.5%
VOE
6.2%

Real Estate

IWS
8.3%
VOE
5.6%

Healthcare

IWS
7.6%
VOE
6.4%

Energy

IWS
7.4%
VOE
12.3%

Utilities

IWS
6.6%
VOE
11.6%

Basic Materials

IWS
5.3%
VOE
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.7%
VOE
7.9%

Communication Services

IWS
3.1%
VOE
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWSVOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.35

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.39

12.65

+0.74

IWS vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWS vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, roughly equal to the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and VOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSVOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-61.50%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-6.93%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-18.45%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-19.70%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-43.18%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-1.07%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-8.33%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.83%

+0.17%

Volatility

IWS vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 3.36%. This indicates that IWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSVOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.36%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

8.36%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

11.64%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

16.01%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

18.79%

+0.56%

IWS vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWS vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than VOE's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.34%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.86%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IWS and VOE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWS has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to VOE (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs VOE's -61.50%.

On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.96% vs 10.56% for IWS. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.96% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.34% for IWS.

IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.05% for VOE.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and VOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer