PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has underperformed USL with an annualized return of 10.23%, while USL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.


IWS

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.74%
YTD
15.06%
6M
15.13%
1Y
27.01%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
10.23%

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.06%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and USL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.33

The correlation between IWS and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWS vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
USL

Industrials

16.7%

-

Technology

16.5%

-

Financial Services

14.1%
4.5%

Real Estate

8.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%

-

Energy

8.1%

-

Healthcare

7.3%

-

Utilities

7.0%

-

Basic Materials

5.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Communication Services

3.1%

-

Industrials

IWS
16.7%
USL

-

Technology

IWS
16.5%
USL

-

Financial Services

IWS
14.1%
USL
4.5%

Real Estate

IWS
8.6%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.4%
USL

-

Energy

IWS
8.1%
USL

-

Healthcare

IWS
7.3%
USL

-

Utilities

IWS
7.0%
USL

-

Basic Materials

IWS
5.4%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.8%
USL

-

Communication Services

IWS
3.1%
USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWSUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

3.47

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.59

7.02

+6.57

IWS vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWSUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.04

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.58

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.34

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.01

+0.41

Drawdowns

IWS vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-89.06%

+26.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-16.76%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-23.33%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-33.82%

+12.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-66.02%

+22.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-38.16%

+38.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-61.46%

+53.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

8.27%

-6.28%

Volatility

IWS vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 3.40%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

10.53%

-7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

23.33%

-13.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

28.54%

-15.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

30.08%

-12.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

32.35%

-12.99%

IWS vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWS vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.34%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWS and USL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to IWS (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 10-year performance, USL leads with 10.91% vs 10.23% for IWS. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USL has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

IWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.88% for USL.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer