IWS vs. SPYV
IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWS returned 10.51%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for SPYV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWS charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
IWS vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 10.51%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.
IWS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
IWS vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 16.45% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 8.25% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWS and SPYV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2001 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IWS and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWS vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWS
SPYV
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
IWS
SPYV
Industrials
IWS
SPYV
Financial Services
IWS
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
IWS
SPYV
Real Estate
IWS
SPYV
Healthcare
IWS
SPYV
Energy
IWS
SPYV
Utilities
IWS
SPYV
Basic Materials
IWS
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
IWS
SPYV
Communication Services
IWS
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWS vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
IWS
SPYV
IWS vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWS | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 3.33 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 12.73 | +1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWS vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWS | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -58.45% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -6.22% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.57% | -17.54% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -17.89% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | -36.89% | -6.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.18% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -8.71% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.63% | +0.37% |
Volatility
IWS vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.70%. This indicates that IWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWS | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 2.70% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 7.26% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.53% | 9.97% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 14.42% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 16.94% | +2.43% |
IWS vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWS vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than SPYV's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.32% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWS and SPYV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWS has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 12.08% vs 10.51% for IWS. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.32% for IWS.
IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.04% for SPYV.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWS and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer