IWS vs. SCHH
IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) and SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index, while SCHH is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWS returned 10.51%/yr vs 4.51%/yr for SCHH. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWS charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SCHH.
Performance
IWS vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IWS having a 16.45% return and SCHH slightly lower at 16.33%. Over the past 10 years, IWS has outperformed SCHH with an annualized return of 10.51%, while SCHH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.51% annualized return.
IWS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
SCHH
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 16.33%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
IWS vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 16.45% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 16.33% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWS and SCHH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IWS and SCHH shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWS vs. SCHH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWS
SCHH
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
IWS
SCHH
-
Industrials
IWS
SCHH
-
Financial Services
IWS
SCHH
Consumer Cyclical
IWS
SCHH
-
Real Estate
IWS
SCHH
Energy
IWS
SCHH
-
Healthcare
IWS
SCHH
-
Utilities
IWS
SCHH
-
Basic Materials
IWS
SCHH
Consumer Defensive
IWS
SCHH
-
Communication Services
IWS
SCHH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWS vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank
IWS
SCHH
IWS vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWS | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.21 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 1.94 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 6.10 | +7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWS vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than SCHH's maximum drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and SCHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWS | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -44.22% | -18.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -8.28% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.57% | -17.76% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -33.28% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | -44.22% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -9.43% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.63% | -0.63% |
Volatility
IWS vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 4.29%, while Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWS | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 4.83% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 9.98% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.53% | 13.56% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 18.74% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 20.99% | -1.62% |
IWS vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWS vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison
IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than SCHH's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.32% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.69% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWS and SCHH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHH has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to IWS (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs SCHH's -44.22%.
On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.51% vs 4.51% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.
SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.32% for IWS.
IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SCHH is REIT. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.07% for SCHH.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWS and SCHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer