PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWR vs. MRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWR vs. MRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than MRK's 13.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWR having a 11.79% annualized return and MRK not far behind at 11.59%.


IWR

1D
0.93%
1M
3.80%
YTD
13.23%
6M
11.96%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
11.79%

MRK

1D
-1.42%
1M
4.94%
YTD
13.94%
6M
20.60%
1Y
50.79%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWR vs. MRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
13.23%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%16.93%30.23%-9.10%18.25%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
13.94%9.79%-6.26%1.01%49.42%1.75%-7.20%22.27%39.95%-1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IWR and MRK is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2001

0.41

The correlation between IWR and MRK shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (5 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWR vs. MRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MRK
MRK Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRK Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRK Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWR vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWRMRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

4.49

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.26

11.22

-0.96

IWR vs. MRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the MRK Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWR and MRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWR vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, smaller than the maximum MRK drawdown of -68.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and MRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWRMRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.78%

-68.61%

+9.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-11.37%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.09%

-43.44%

+22.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-43.44%

+17.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

-43.44%

+2.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.03%

+5.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-18.83%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

4.54%

-2.41%

Volatility

IWR vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 4.49%, while Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) has a volatility of 9.57%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWRMRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

9.57%

-5.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

18.04%

-7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

27.18%

-13.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

23.66%

-5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.38%

22.96%

-3.58%

Dividends

IWR vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison

IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than MRK's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.14%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.79%3.12%3.14%2.72%2.52%3.41%3.03%2.48%2.60%3.36%3.14%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWR and MRK have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRK has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to IWR (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs MRK's -68.61%.

MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWR and MRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer