IWP vs. VCIT
IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index, while VCIT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWP returned 12.47%/yr vs 2.93%/yr for VCIT. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWP charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VCIT.
Performance
IWP vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWP achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IWP has outperformed VCIT with an annualized return of 12.47%, while VCIT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.93% annualized return.
IWP
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
VCIT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 6.00%
- 3Y*
- 6.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
IWP vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 2.86% | 8.45% | 21.86% | 25.70% | -26.90% | 12.60% | 35.25% | 35.04% | -4.89% | 24.93% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.41% | 9.34% | 3.20% | 8.98% | -13.98% | -1.77% | 9.46% | 14.10% | -1.74% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWP and VCIT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, IWP and VCIT have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWP vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank
IWP
VCIT
IWP vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWP | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.24 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 1.88 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 6.07 | -5.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWP vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWP drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than VCIT's maximum drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWP and VCIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWP | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.92% | -20.56% | -36.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -2.96% | -11.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.20% | -6.11% | -19.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.62% | -20.56% | -18.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.62% | -20.56% | -18.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -1.13% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -3.16% | -6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 0.92% | +4.18% |
Volatility
IWP vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) at 1.48%. This indicates that IWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWP | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 1.48% | +4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 3.15% | +10.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 4.10% | +12.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 6.62% | +15.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 6.28% | +15.43% |
IWP vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWP has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWP vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison
IWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VCIT's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.16% | 0.98% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.79% | 4.62% | 4.43% | 3.72% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 2.78% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.21% | 3.29% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWP and VCIT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to VCIT (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWP dropped -56.92% vs VCIT's -20.56%.
On 10-year performance, IWP leads with 12.47% vs 2.93% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWP has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWP.
VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.
IWP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VCIT is Corporate Bonds. IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index, while VCIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWP and 0.03% for VCIT.
VCIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWP and VCIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer