IWP vs. EVTR
IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index, while EVTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. IWP is passively managed, while EVTR is actively managed. Over the past year, IWP returned 2.82% vs 5.42% for EVTR. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWP charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for EVTR.
Performance
IWP vs. EVTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWP achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly higher than EVTR's -0.18% return.
IWP
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
EVTR
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 5.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWP vs. EVTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 1.66% | 8.45% | 12.65% |
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | -0.18% | 8.10% | 4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWP and EVTR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024 | 0.25 |
The correlation between IWP and EVTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWP vs. EVTR — Risk / Return Rank
IWP
EVTR
IWP vs. EVTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWP | EVTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.26 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 1.90 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 5.94 | -5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWP | EVTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 1.50 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.26 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
IWP vs. EVTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWP drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than EVTR's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWP and EVTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWP | EVTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.92% | -4.08% | -52.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -2.86% | -11.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -1.90% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -0.97% | -8.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 0.91% | +4.17% |
Volatility
IWP vs. EVTR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) at 1.40%. This indicates that IWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWP | EVTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 1.40% | +3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.93% | 2.81% | +10.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 3.64% | +13.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 4.31% | +18.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 4.31% | +17.39% |
IWP vs. EVTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWP has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than EVTR's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWP vs. EVTR - Dividend Comparison
IWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than EVTR's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | 4.70% | 4.51% | 4.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.16% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWP and EVTR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWP has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to EVTR (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWP dropped -56.92% vs EVTR's -4.08%.
On 1-year performance, EVTR leads with 5.42% vs 2.82% for IWP. On fees, IWP is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, EVTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVTR has performed better with a 5.42% return vs 2.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWP is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EVTR.
EVTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.
IWP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while EVTR is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWP and 0.32% for EVTR.
EVTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWP and EVTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer