PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMY vs. HOOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMY vs. HOOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly higher than HOOX's -55.55% return.


IWMY

1D
1.41%
1M
2.87%
YTD
13.83%
6M
12.08%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOX

1D
13.29%
1M
22.45%
YTD
-55.55%
6M
-70.84%
1Y
-23.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMY vs. HOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and HOOX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025

0.58

The correlation between IWMY and HOOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMY vs. HOOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOX
HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. HOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMYHOOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.09

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

-0.27

+2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

-0.44

+7.52

IWMY vs. HOOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the HOOX Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and HOOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMYHOOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

-0.17

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.45

+0.54

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. HOOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum HOOX drawdown of -87.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and HOOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMYHOOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-87.11%

+68.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-87.11%

+75.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-79.42%

+79.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-37.60%

+34.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

53.67%

-50.16%

Volatility

IWMY vs. HOOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) is 5.37%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a volatility of 43.41%. This indicates that IWMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMYHOOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

43.41%

-38.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

101.80%

-89.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

137.82%

-122.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

144.31%

-128.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

144.31%

-128.55%

IWMY vs. HOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than HOOX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWMY vs. HOOX - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.16%, more than HOOX's 31.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HOOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF
31.77%14.12%0.00%0.00%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
46.16%63.33%107.92%11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMY and HOOX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOX has higher volatility (43.41%) compared to IWMY (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs HOOX's -87.11%.

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 24.81% vs -23.62% for HOOX. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 24.81% return vs -23.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 46.16%, compared with 31.77% for HOOX.

IWMY is categorized as Options Trading, while HOOX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IWMY and 1.31% for HOOX.

IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMY and HOOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer