IWMO.MI vs. R1GR.AS
IWMO.MI (iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)) and R1GR.AS (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMO.MI is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index, while R1GR.AS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IWMO.MI returned 31.43% vs 22.53% for R1GR.AS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWMO.MI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for R1GR.AS.
Performance
IWMO.MI vs. R1GR.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWMO.MI is traded in EUR, while R1GR.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the R1GR.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMO.MI achieves a 22.51% return, which is significantly higher than R1GR.AS's 7.68% return.
IWMO.MI
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 6.80%
- YTD
- 22.51%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 31.43%
- 3Y*
- 26.15%
- 5Y*
- 14.68%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
R1GR.AS
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMO.MI vs. R1GR.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMO.MI iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.51% | 8.04% | 39.23% | 5.35% |
R1GR.AS iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF | 7.68% | 3.62% | 43.99% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMO.MI and R1GR.AS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between IWMO.MI and R1GR.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMO.MI vs. R1GR.AS — Risk / Return Rank
IWMO.MI
R1GR.AS
IWMO.MI vs. R1GR.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWMO.MI | R1GR.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 1.56 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 4.39 | +8.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWMO.MI | R1GR.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.44 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.15 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
IWMO.MI vs. R1GR.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMO.MI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, which is greater than R1GR.AS's maximum drawdown of -27.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMO.MI and R1GR.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMO.MI | R1GR.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.03% | -27.06% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -14.67% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -1.38% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -4.95% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 5.26% | -2.89% |
Volatility
IWMO.MI vs. R1GR.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) at 4.11%. This indicates that IWMO.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than R1GR.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMO.MI | R1GR.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 4.11% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 11.20% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 15.90% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 19.57% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 19.57% | -1.97% |
IWMO.MI vs. R1GR.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWMO.MI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than R1GR.AS's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWMO.MI vs. R1GR.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWMO.MI nor R1GR.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMO.MI and R1GR.AS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, R1GR.AS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R1GR.AS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWMO.MI.
IWMO.MI is categorized as Momentum, while R1GR.AS is Large Cap Growth Equities. IWMO.MI tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while R1GR.AS tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWMO.MI and 0.18% for R1GR.AS.
Find the right allocation for IWMO.MI and R1GR.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer