PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMO.MI vs. IMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMO.MI vs. IMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWMO.MI is traded in EUR, while IMTM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IMTM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMO.MI achieves a 22.51% return, which is significantly higher than IMTM's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IWMO.MI has outperformed IMTM with an annualized return of 15.31%, while IMTM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.


IWMO.MI

1D
-0.90%
1M
8.73%
YTD
22.51%
6M
23.74%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
15.31%

IMTM

1D
0.52%
1M
4.38%
YTD
13.05%
6M
14.44%
1Y
22.15%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMO.MI vs. IMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWMO.MI
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
22.51%8.04%39.23%7.91%-13.96%24.82%17.08%31.14%0.40%16.05%
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
13.05%18.54%19.57%10.47%-11.66%11.24%12.10%27.33%-10.28%10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMO.MI and IMTM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015

0.56

The correlation between IWMO.MI and IMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMO.MI vs. IMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMO.MI
IWMO.MI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IWMO.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMO.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMO.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMO.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMO.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMO.MI vs. IMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI) and iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMO.MIIMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

2.03

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

8.38

+4.98

IWMO.MI vs. IMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMO.MI Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the IMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMO.MI and IMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMO.MIIMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.47

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.66

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.58

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.50

+0.30

Drawdowns

IWMO.MI vs. IMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMO.MI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, roughly equal to the maximum IMTM drawdown of -30.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMO.MI and IMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMO.MIIMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.03%

-30.60%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-10.98%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.45%

-15.94%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

-21.25%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.03%

-30.60%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

0.00%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-6.10%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.65%

-0.28%

Volatility

IWMO.MI vs. IMTM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) at 4.53%. This indicates that IWMO.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMO.MIIMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

4.53%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

13.23%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

15.17%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

15.54%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

16.72%

+0.88%

IWMO.MI vs. IMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMO.MI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IMTM's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWMO.MI vs. IMTM - Dividend Comparison

IWMO.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.21%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
IWMO.MI
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMO.MI and IMTM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWMO.MI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWMO.MI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.

IWMO.MI tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWMO.MI and 0.30% for IMTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMO.MI and IMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer