PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWM vs. IWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWM vs. IWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWM achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than IWD's 14.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWM having a 10.93% annualized return and IWD not far ahead at 11.23%.


IWM

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.83%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.93%

IWD

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.22%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.76%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
11.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWM vs. IWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
17.07%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.20%15.68%14.17%11.34%-7.75%24.95%2.73%26.12%-8.45%13.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IWM and IWD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2000

0.85

The correlation between IWM and IWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWM vs. IWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWM
IWD

Technology

19.5%
17.9%

Industrials

17.1%
12.7%

Financial Services

15.8%
18.5%

Healthcare

15.8%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
7.0%

Energy

6.0%
6.5%

Real Estate

5.7%
3.9%

Basic Materials

4.5%
3.7%

Utilities

3.0%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
6.7%

Communication Services

2.0%
8.2%

Technology

IWM
19.5%
IWD
17.9%

Industrials

IWM
17.1%
IWD
12.7%

Financial Services

IWM
15.8%
IWD
18.5%

Healthcare

IWM
15.8%
IWD
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IWM
7.8%
IWD
7.0%

Energy

IWM
6.0%
IWD
6.5%

Real Estate

IWM
5.7%
IWD
3.9%

Basic Materials

IWM
4.5%
IWD
3.7%

Utilities

IWM
3.0%
IWD
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

IWM
2.1%
IWD
6.7%

Communication Services

IWM
2.0%
IWD
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWM vs. IWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IWD
IWD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWM vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMIWDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

2.63

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

3.71

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

4.17

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.64

17.46

-4.82

IWM vs. IWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWM Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the IWD Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWM and IWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMIWDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.63

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.69

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.65

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.43

-0.06

Drawdowns

IWM vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWM drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, roughly equal to the maximum IWD drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWM and IWD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMIWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-60.10%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-6.79%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

-15.71%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

-19.04%

-12.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

-38.51%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.01%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-8.65%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

1.62%

+1.48%

Volatility

IWM vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) at 2.90%. This indicates that IWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMIWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

2.90%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

8.06%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

10.77%

+8.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.52%

14.81%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.04%

17.29%

+5.75%

IWM vs. IWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IWD's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWM vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison

IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than IWD's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.50%1.69%1.87%2.02%2.15%1.62%2.05%2.45%2.71%2.09%2.25%2.47%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.88%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWM and IWD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to IWD (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWM dropped -59.05% vs IWD's -60.10%.

On 10-year performance, IWD leads with 11.23% vs 10.93% for IWM. On fees, IWD is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWD has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWD has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWD is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.

IWD has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

IWM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IWD is Large Cap Value Equities. IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index, while IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IWM and 0.18% for IWD.

IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWM and IWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer