IWM vs. CALF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - IWM tracks the Russell 2000 Index while CALF tracks the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWM returned 6.11%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for CALF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWM charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.

Performance

IWM vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWM achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 13.34% return.

IWM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

CALF

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 13.34%
• 6M: 12.53%
• 1Y: 30.24%
• 3Y*: 10.69%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWM vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	17.07%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	20.03%	25.39%	-11.12%	9.09%
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF	13.34%	2.33%	-7.41%	35.43%	-15.20%	40.68%	16.55%	18.18%	-10.06%	5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IWM and CALF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017	0.87

The correlation between IWM and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWM vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWM	CALF
Technology	19.5%	29.7%
Industrials	17.1%	5.9%
Financial Services	15.8%	0.2%
Healthcare	15.8%	9.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	28.3%
Energy	6.0%	10.3%
Real Estate	5.7%	1.6%
Basic Materials	4.5%	1.6%
Utilities	3.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	4.3%
Communication Services	2.0%	8.8%

Return for Risk

IWM vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CALF

CALF Risk / Return Rank: 66
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWM vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWM	CALF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.93	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	2.82	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	4.94	-1.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.64	14.08	-1.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWM vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWM Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWM and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWM	CALF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	1.93	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.18	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.37	0.00

Drawdowns

IWM vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWM drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than CALF's maximum drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWM and CALF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWM	CALF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.05%	-47.58%	-11.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.03%	-6.15%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.50%	-34.22%	+6.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.91%	-34.22%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-1.95%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-10.74%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	2.15%	+0.95%

Volatility

IWM vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) at 4.92%. This indicates that IWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWM	CALF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.75%	4.92%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.53%	10.47%	+3.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.20%	15.84%	+3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.52%	23.44%	-0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.04%	26.02%	-2.98%

IWM vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWM vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than CALF's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.28%	1.43%	1.07%	1.18%	0.85%	2.63%	0.82%	0.99%	1.39%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWM and CALF in my portfolio?

IWM and CALF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWM or CALF?

IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to CALF (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWM dropped -59.05% vs CALF's -47.58%.

Which ETF is better, IWM or CALF?

On 5-year performance, IWM leads with 6.11% vs 4.12% for CALF. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWM or CALF?

Over the 5-year period, IWM has performed better with a 6.11% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWM or CALF?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWM or CALF?

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

What is the main difference between IWM and CALF?

IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IWM and 0.59% for CALF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.