PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWIRX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWIRX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund (IWIRX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWIRX achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 30.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWIRX having a 13.48% annualized return and RYGRX not far behind at 13.20%.


IWIRX

1D
0.50%
1M
3.73%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.89%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
13.48%

RYGRX

1D
0.92%
1M
11.15%
YTD
30.14%
6M
30.55%
1Y
37.82%
3Y*
25.67%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWIRX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWIRX
Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund
5.43%19.93%19.47%39.36%-29.72%4.85%36.21%37.05%-16.90%34.77%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
30.14%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IWIRX and RYGRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.87

The correlation between IWIRX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWIRX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWIRX
IWIRX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IWIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IWIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWIRX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund (IWIRX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWIRXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

3.53

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

13.56

-6.98

IWIRX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWIRX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWIRXRYGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.00

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.47

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.58

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.44

-0.05

Drawdowns

IWIRX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWIRX drawdown since its inception was -70.99%, which is greater than RYGRX's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWIRX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWIRXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.99%

-54.22%

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.03%

-11.17%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.26%

-24.95%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.99%

-36.57%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.99%

-36.63%

-8.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.31%

-9.41%

-11.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.91%

+0.25%

Volatility

IWIRX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund (IWIRX) is 3.58%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that IWIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWIRXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

6.39%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

16.30%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

19.71%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.36%

23.50%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

22.88%

-0.08%

IWIRX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWIRX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWIRX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

IWIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.93%, more than RYGRX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWIRX
Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund
15.93%16.79%12.54%3.85%12.52%2.58%2.65%4.54%7.63%2.27%0.92%4.77%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.91%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWIRX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to IWIRX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWIRX dropped -70.99% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWIRX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer