PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWFS.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFS.L achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IWFS.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 9.00%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.54% annualized return.


IWFS.L

1D
0.39%
1M
2.27%
YTD
6.39%
6M
7.47%
1Y
18.20%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
9.00%

IUIT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
16.60%
YTD
26.17%
6M
24.49%
1Y
56.60%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
27.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWFS.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF
6.39%13.13%7.64%9.74%-8.21%13.88%7.33%19.31%-9.50%13.28%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
23.54%14.17%40.92%51.48%-20.73%35.36%38.94%43.23%4.43%25.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFS.L and IUIT.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between IWFS.L and IUIT.L has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWFS.L
IUIT.L

Industrials

21.4%
0.0%

Financial Services

14.2%

-

Technology

12.0%
99.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%

-

Healthcare

7.4%

-

Basic Materials

7.1%

-

Real Estate

6.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.6%

-

Utilities

6.3%

-

Communication Services

4.8%

-

Energy

3.5%
0.1%

Industrials

IWFS.L
21.4%
IUIT.L
0.0%

Financial Services

IWFS.L
14.2%
IUIT.L

-

Technology

IWFS.L
12.0%
IUIT.L
99.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IWFS.L
9.7%
IUIT.L

-

Healthcare

IWFS.L
7.4%
IUIT.L

-

Basic Materials

IWFS.L
7.1%
IUIT.L

-

Real Estate

IWFS.L
6.9%
IUIT.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IWFS.L
6.6%
IUIT.L

-

Utilities

IWFS.L
6.3%
IUIT.L

-

Communication Services

IWFS.L
4.8%
IUIT.L

-

Energy

IWFS.L
3.5%
IUIT.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFS.L
IWFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
IWFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWFS.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.32

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

8.42

-0.70

IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFS.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFS.LIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.78

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

1.14

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

1.26

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.24

-0.61

Drawdowns

IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFS.L drawdown since its inception was -29.90%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFS.L and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFS.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.90%

-28.01%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-16.96%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-28.01%

+13.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-28.01%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.90%

-28.01%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.78%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-5.29%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

6.70%

-4.35%

Volatility

IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) is 2.53%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that IWFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWFS.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

7.16%

-4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

15.20%

-7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.23%

20.23%

-10.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.96%

22.82%

-9.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.39%

22.51%

-8.12%

IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWFS.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFS.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IWFS.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFS.L.

IWFS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. IWFS.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWFS.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFS.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer