IWFS.L vs. XDEQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L).
IWFS.L and XDEQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWFS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 3, 2014. XDEQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2014. Both IWFS.L and XDEQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWFS.L or XDEQ.L.
Correlation
The correlation between IWFS.L and XDEQ.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWFS.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWFS.L:
1.14
XDEQ.L:
1.31
IWFS.L:
1.64
XDEQ.L:
1.93
IWFS.L:
1.21
XDEQ.L:
1.24
IWFS.L:
2.07
XDEQ.L:
2.20
IWFS.L:
5.58
XDEQ.L:
7.56
IWFS.L:
2.07%
XDEQ.L:
1.87%
IWFS.L:
10.14%
XDEQ.L:
10.92%
IWFS.L:
-29.90%
XDEQ.L:
-23.79%
IWFS.L:
-1.04%
XDEQ.L:
-1.25%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWFS.L achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly higher than XDEQ.L's 3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IWFS.L has underperformed XDEQ.L with an annualized return of 8.02%, while XDEQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.
IWFS.L
3.70%
-0.65%
7.97%
12.41%
6.42%
8.02%
XDEQ.L
3.04%
-0.16%
6.88%
16.45%
12.09%
12.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWFS.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWFS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWFS.L vs. XDEQ.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IWFS.L
XDEQ.L
IWFS.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWFS.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWFS.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFS.L iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% |
Drawdowns
IWFS.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWFS.L drawdown since its inception was -29.90%, which is greater than XDEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFS.L and XDEQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWFS.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that IWFS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.