IWFS.L vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
IWFS.L and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWFS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 3, 2014. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both IWFS.L and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWFS.L or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between IWFS.L and VOO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IWFS.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWFS.L:
1.33
VOO:
1.92
IWFS.L:
1.90
VOO:
2.58
IWFS.L:
1.24
VOO:
1.35
IWFS.L:
2.41
VOO:
2.88
IWFS.L:
6.50
VOO:
12.03
IWFS.L:
2.07%
VOO:
2.02%
IWFS.L:
10.13%
VOO:
12.69%
IWFS.L:
-29.90%
VOO:
-33.99%
IWFS.L:
-0.17%
VOO:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWFS.L achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 4.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IWFS.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.11%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.
IWFS.L
4.61%
0.30%
9.14%
12.75%
6.37%
8.11%
VOO
4.36%
2.34%
10.20%
24.11%
14.50%
13.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWFS.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWFS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWFS.L vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IWFS.L
VOO
IWFS.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWFS.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
IWFS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFS.L iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
IWFS.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWFS.L drawdown since its inception was -29.90%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFS.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWFS.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IWFS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.01%. This indicates that IWFS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.