PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFH vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWFH vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IWFH

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLK

1D
-6.66%
1M
6.04%
YTD
25.39%
6M
23.33%
1Y
53.58%
3Y*
30.43%
5Y*
21.75%
10Y*
24.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFH vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IWFH
iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF
0.00%0.00%-7.41%17.42%-39.32%-25.56%15.64%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
25.39%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFH and XLK is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2020

0.56

The correlation between IWFH and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWFH vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWFH
XLK

Technology

43.2%
99.7%

Communication Services

31.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IWFH
43.2%
XLK
99.7%

Communication Services

IWFH
31.6%
XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWFH
9.9%
XLK

-

Healthcare

IWFH
9.1%
XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

IWFH
6.3%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

IWFH

-

XLK

-

Energy

IWFH

-

XLK
0.2%

Financial Services

IWFH

-

XLK

-

Industrials

IWFH

-

XLK
0.1%

Real Estate

IWFH

-

XLK

-

Utilities

IWFH

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWFH vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFH

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFH vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IWFH vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFHXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

Drawdowns

IWFH vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFHXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

Volatility

IWFH vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWFHXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.59%

IWFH vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWFH vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWFH
iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF
0.00%0.00%0.05%1.83%0.31%0.00%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.42%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWFH and XLK have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IWFH.

XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for IWFH.

IWFH tracks NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.08% for XLK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFH and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer