IWFH vs. XLK
IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IWFH tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
IWFH vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IWFH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -6.66%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 25.39%
- 6M
- 23.33%
- 1Y
- 53.58%
- 3Y*
- 30.43%
- 5Y*
- 21.75%
- 10Y*
- 24.71%
IWFH vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -7.41% | 17.42% | -39.32% | -25.56% | 15.64% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 25.39% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWFH and XLK is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IWFH and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWFH vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWFH
XLK
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IWFH
XLK
Communication Services
IWFH
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWFH
XLK
-
Healthcare
IWFH
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
IWFH
XLK
-
Basic Materials
IWFH
-
XLK
-
Energy
IWFH
-
XLK
Financial Services
IWFH
-
XLK
-
Industrials
IWFH
-
XLK
Real Estate
IWFH
-
XLK
-
Utilities
IWFH
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWFH vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
IWFH
XLK
IWFH vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWFH | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.40 | — |
Drawdowns
IWFH vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWFH | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -82.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -9.04% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.95% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.78% | — |
Volatility
IWFH vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWFH | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 21.96% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 25.07% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 24.59% | — |
IWFH vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWFH vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.83% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWFH and XLK have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IWFH.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for IWFH.
IWFH tracks NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for IWFH and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer