IWFH vs. PXQ
IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IWFH tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index while PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PXQ.
Performance
IWFH vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IWFH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXQ
- 1D
- -8.23%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- 45.39%
- 6M
- 43.82%
- 1Y
- 76.20%
- 3Y*
- 37.99%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 19.92%
IWFH vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -7.41% | 17.42% | -39.32% | -25.56% | 15.64% |
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 45.39% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 21.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWFH and PXQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between IWFH and PXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWFH vs. PXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWFH
PXQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IWFH
PXQ
Communication Services
IWFH
PXQ
Consumer Cyclical
IWFH
PXQ
-
Healthcare
IWFH
PXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
IWFH
PXQ
-
Basic Materials
IWFH
-
PXQ
-
Energy
IWFH
-
PXQ
-
Financial Services
IWFH
-
PXQ
Industrials
IWFH
-
PXQ
Real Estate
IWFH
-
PXQ
Utilities
IWFH
-
PXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWFH vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank
IWFH
PXQ
IWFH vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWFH | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.55 | — |
Drawdowns
IWFH vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWFH | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -57.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -11.59% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.74% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.39% | — |
Volatility
IWFH vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWFH | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 23.15% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 23.51% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 23.13% | — |
IWFH vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWFH vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison
IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.83% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.64% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWFH and PXQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IWFH.
PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for IWFH.
IWFH tracks NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.40% for PXQ.
Find the right allocation for IWFH and PXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer