IWFH vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWFH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

IWFH vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IWFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: -3.55%
• 1M: -1.80%
• YTD: 14.62%
• 6M: 12.89%
• 1Y: 36.52%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 10.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFH vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-7.41%	17.42%	-39.32%	-25.56%	15.64%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	14.62%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	29.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFH and IWM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2020	0.58

The correlation between IWFH and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWFH vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWFH	IWM
Technology	43.2%	19.5%
Communication Services	31.6%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	7.8%
Healthcare	9.1%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	2.1%
Basic Materials	-	4.5%
Energy	-	6.0%
Financial Services	-	15.8%
Industrials	-	17.1%
Real Estate	-	5.7%
Utilities	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

IWFH vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 59
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 51
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFH vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWFH	IWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.36	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFH	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-59.05%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.55%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.76%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWFH	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	19.54%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.58%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	23.06%	—

IWFH vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFH vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	1.83%	0.31%	0.00%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.90%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWFH and IWM in my portfolio?

IWFH and IWM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWFH or IWM?

On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWFH or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IWFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWFH or IWM?

IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for IWFH.

What is the main difference between IWFH and IWM?

IWFH is categorized as Technology Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IWFH tracks NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.19% for IWM.