IWFH vs. CRTC

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

IWFH (iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IWFH tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWFH charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

IWFH vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IWFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRTC

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -2.25%
• YTD: 4.02%
• 6M: 2.99%
• 1Y: 13.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFH vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-7.41%	5.27%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	4.02%	18.69%	18.05%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFH and CRTC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.31

IWFH vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWFH	CRTC
Technology	43.2%	39.5%
Communication Services	31.6%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	5.4%
Healthcare	9.1%	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	3.1%
Energy	-	6.0%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Industrials	-	12.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	5.3%

Return for Risk

IWFH vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 31
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFH vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWFH	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.04	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.18	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.23	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFH	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.07%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.43%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.18%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWFH	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.52%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.86%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.86%	—

IWFH vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFH vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

IWFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.91%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	1.83%	0.31%	0.00%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWFH and CRTC in my portfolio?

IWFH and CRTC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWFH or CRTC?

On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWFH or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IWFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWFH or CRTC?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for IWFH.

What is the main difference between IWFH and CRTC?

IWFH tracks NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IWFH and 0.35% for CRTC.