PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWF vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IWF vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IWF vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWF achieves a -9.83% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 8.17% return.


IWF

1D
3.77%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
-9.83%
6M
-8.80%
1Y
18.54%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
16.53%

FMTM

1D
4.80%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
8.17%
6M
16.49%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWF vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IWF vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWF
IWF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWF vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWFFMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

1.58

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

2.09

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

3.15

-2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.95

11.97

-8.02

IWF vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWF Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWF and FMTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.58

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.61

-1.25

Correlation

The correlation between IWF and FMTM is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IWF vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

IWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than FMTM's 0.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.40%0.36%0.46%0.67%0.91%0.49%0.66%0.99%1.27%1.10%1.43%1.37%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IWF vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWF drawdown since its inception was -64.25%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWF and FMTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.25%

-12.12%

-52.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.27%

-12.12%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.12%

-7.90%

-5.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.21%

-1.88%

-20.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

3.19%

+1.55%

Volatility

IWF vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is 6.74%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 11.09%. This indicates that IWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IWFFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

11.09%

-4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

19.22%

-6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.40%

23.34%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

23.18%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

23.18%

-2.26%