IWDL vs. BMNG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

IWDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. IWDL is passively managed, while BMNG is actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWDL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.

Performance

IWDL vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDL achieves a 34.91% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -83.14% return.

IWDL

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 4.70%
• 6M: 26.38%
• YTD: 34.91%
• 1Y: 53.49%
• 3Y*: 29.19%
• 5Y*: 15.46%
• 10Y*: —

BMNG

• 1D: -4.71%
• 1M: -22.33%
• 6M: -86.67%
• YTD: -83.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWDL vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN	34.91%	3.95%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-83.14%	-80.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IWDL and BMNG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

IWDL vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWDL

IWDL Risk / Return Rank: 87
IWDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
IWDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IWDL Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IWDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
IWDL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BMNG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDL vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWDL	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.25	—	—

Drawdowns

IWDL vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDL drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -97.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDL and BMNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWDL	BMNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.95%	-97.32%	+59.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-96.86%	+96.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.41%	-83.13%	+72.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWDL	BMNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.41%	185.89%	-162.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.30%	185.89%	-155.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.91%	185.89%	-155.98%

IWDL vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWDL vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWDL nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWDL and BMNG in my portfolio?

IWDL and BMNG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWDL or BMNG?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWDL or BMNG?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for IWDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWDL or BMNG?

IWDL and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IWDL and BMNG?

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for IWDL and 0.75% for BMNG.