IWD vs. IWM
IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWD returned 11.56%/yr vs 10.70%/yr for IWM. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IWD charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
IWD vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWD achieves a 20.56% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IWD has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 11.56%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.70% annualized return.
IWD
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 15.34%
- YTD
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 32.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.29%
IWM
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- 6M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 1Y
- 36.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $542.34M | $454.50M | $526.80M | |
| $6.67B | $6.32B | $7.45B |
IWD vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 20.56% | 15.68% | 14.17% | 11.34% | -7.75% | 24.95% | 2.73% | 26.12% | -8.45% | 13.45% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 18.79% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWD and IWM is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IWD and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWD vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWD
IWM
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
IWD
IWM
Financial Services
IWD
IWM
Healthcare
IWD
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
IWD
IWM
Industrials
IWD
IWM
Consumer Defensive
IWD
IWM
Energy
IWD
IWM
Utilities
IWD
IWM
Real Estate
IWD
IWM
Basic Materials
IWD
IWM
Communication Services
IWD
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWD vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
IWD
IWM
IWD vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWD | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.30 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 3.11 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.60 | 11.02 | +8.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWD vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWD drawdown since its inception was -60.10%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWD and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWD | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.10% | -59.05% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -11.03% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.71% | -27.50% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | -31.91% | +12.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.51% | -41.13% | +2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -3.08% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -10.71% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 3.11% | -1.52% |
Volatility
IWD vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is 2.86%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that IWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWD | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 3.82% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 14.12% | -5.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.35% | 19.41% | -8.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 22.48% | -7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 23.01% | -5.76% |
IWD vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWD has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWD vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than IWM's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.39% | 1.69% | 1.87% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 2.47% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWD and IWM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to IWD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWD dropped -60.10% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, IWD leads with 11.56% vs 10.70% for IWM. On fees, IWD is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWD has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWD has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWD is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.
IWD has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.91% for IWM.
IWD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IWD and 0.19% for IWM.
IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWD and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer