IWD vs. IWDL
IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) and IWDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - IWD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index, while IWDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWD returned 10.17%/yr vs 13.11%/yr for IWDL. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IWD charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for IWDL.
Performance
IWD vs. IWDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWD achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly lower than IWDL's 26.54% return.
IWD
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
IWDL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 7.80%
- YTD
- 26.54%
- 6M
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 53.26%
- 3Y*
- 29.96%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- —
IWD vs. IWDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 14.20% | 15.68% | 14.17% | 11.34% | -7.75% | 20.37% |
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN | 26.54% | 25.02% | 20.68% | 13.50% | -21.27% | 40.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWD and IWDL is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between IWD and IWDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWD vs. IWDL — Risk / Return Rank
IWD
IWDL
IWD vs. IWDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWD | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.40 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 3.95 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.46 | 16.27 | +1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWD | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.35 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.44 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.60 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
IWD vs. IWDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWD drawdown since its inception was -60.10%, which is greater than IWDL's maximum drawdown of -37.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWD and IWDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWD | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.10% | -37.95% | -22.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -13.53% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.71% | -31.78% | +16.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | -37.95% | +18.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.06% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -10.59% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 3.28% | -1.66% |
Volatility
IWD vs. IWDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is 2.90%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that IWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWD | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 5.72% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | 17.62% | -9.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.77% | 22.76% | -11.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 30.29% | -15.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 30.02% | -12.73% |
IWD vs. IWDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWD has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWD vs. IWDL - Dividend Comparison
IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while IWDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.50% | 1.69% | 1.87% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 2.47% |
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, IWD and IWDL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IWDL has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to IWD (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWD dropped -60.10% vs IWDL's -37.95%.
On 5-year performance, IWDL leads with 13.11% vs 10.17% for IWD. On fees, IWD is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWD has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWDL has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWD is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for IWDL.
IWD has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for IWDL.
IWD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IWDL is Leveraged Equities. IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while IWDL tracks Russell 1000 Value (200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IWD and 0.95% for IWDL.
IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWD and IWDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer