PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWD vs. FLCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWD vs. FLCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWD achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly higher than FLCSX's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IWD has underperformed FLCSX with an annualized return of 11.23%, while FLCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.


IWD

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.22%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.76%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
11.23%

FLCSX

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.26%
YTD
9.75%
6M
11.60%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWD vs. FLCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.20%15.68%14.17%11.34%-7.75%24.95%2.73%26.12%-8.45%13.45%
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
9.75%27.49%26.31%23.51%-8.02%25.80%9.05%31.59%-13.62%17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IWD and FLCSX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2000

0.92

The correlation between IWD and FLCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWD vs. FLCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWD
IWD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCSX
FLCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FLCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWD vs. FLCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWDFLCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.47

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

3.32

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.46

15.16

+2.30

IWD vs. FLCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWD Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the FLCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWD and FLCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWDFLCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.60

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.95

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.82

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.50

-0.08

Drawdowns

IWD vs. FLCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWD drawdown since its inception was -60.10%, smaller than the maximum FLCSX drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWD and FLCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDFLCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.10%

-63.67%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-9.55%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.71%

-18.82%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-21.69%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

-37.11%

-1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.25%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-13.82%

+5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

2.08%

-0.46%

Volatility

IWD vs. FLCSX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) have volatilities of 2.90% and 2.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWDFLCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.86%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

9.31%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

12.19%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

16.85%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

18.66%

-1.37%

IWD vs. FLCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWD has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCSX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWD vs. FLCSX - Dividend Comparison

IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than FLCSX's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
5.92%6.50%4.26%2.83%3.07%4.71%3.93%5.43%7.63%3.25%3.61%4.55%
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.50%1.69%1.87%2.02%2.15%1.62%2.05%2.45%2.71%2.09%2.25%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWD and FLCSX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWD has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to FLCSX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWD dropped -60.10% vs FLCSX's -63.67%.

IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWD and FLCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer