IWC vs. SMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Microcap ETF (IWC) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV).
IWC and SMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Microcap Index. It was launched on Aug 12, 2005. SMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. Both IWC and SMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IWC vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWC vs. SMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWC iShares Microcap ETF | 1.36% | 22.45% | 13.63% | 8.99% | -21.93% | 18.67% | 20.88% | 22.20% | -13.13% | 12.79% |
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 4.65% | 0.26% | 7.03% | 8.99% | -5.90% | 18.98% | -4.74% | 17.23% | -0.58% | 4.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWC achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than SMDV's 4.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IWC has outperformed SMDV with an annualized return of 10.08%, while SMDV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.
IWC
- 1D
- 4.11%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 45.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
SMDV
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 4.62%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWC vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWC vs. SMDV — Risk / Return Rank
IWC
SMDV
IWC vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Microcap ETF (IWC) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWC | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 0.42 | +1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | 0.75 | +1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.09 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 0.71 | +2.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.63 | 2.07 | +8.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWC | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 0.42 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.19 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.34 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.37 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWC and SMDV is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IWC vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison
IWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than SMDV's 2.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWC iShares Microcap ETF | 1.06% | 1.10% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.18% | 0.78% | 0.98% | 1.19% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.49% |
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 2.51% | 2.67% | 2.68% | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.02% | 2.13% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 1.84% | 1.35% | 1.81% |
Drawdowns
IWC vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWC drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than SMDV's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWC and SMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWC | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.61% | -34.12% | -30.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.35% | -10.94% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -21.23% | -19.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.21% | -34.12% | -13.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.83% | -6.47% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -5.99% | -9.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 3.73% | +0.38% |
Volatility
IWC vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Microcap ETF (IWC) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) at 4.27%. This indicates that IWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWC | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.16% | 4.27% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 10.67% | +7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.33% | 18.24% | +8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 18.71% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.30% | 20.71% | +3.59% |