IWB vs. AMOMX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX).
IWB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. AMOMX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jul 9, 2009.
Performance
IWB vs. AMOMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWB vs. AMOMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | -4.29% | 17.18% | 24.32% | 26.39% | -19.19% | 26.32% | 20.77% | 31.06% | -4.90% | 21.52% |
AMOMX AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund | -6.19% | 15.36% | 27.62% | 18.17% | -18.00% | 26.01% | 26.86% | 29.20% | -4.01% | 23.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWB achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly higher than AMOMX's -6.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWB having a 13.74% annualized return and AMOMX not far behind at 13.17%.
IWB
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.29%
- 6M
- -1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.47%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 13.74%
AMOMX
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -6.19%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWB vs. AMOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMOMX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWB vs. AMOMX — Risk / Return Rank
IWB
AMOMX
IWB vs. AMOMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWB | AMOMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.73 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.16 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 0.99 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 4.50 | +2.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWB | AMOMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.73 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.50 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.63 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.69 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWB and AMOMX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IWB vs. AMOMX - Dividend Comparison
IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than AMOMX's 27.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 1.06% | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% |
AMOMX AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund | 27.17% | 25.49% | 14.05% | 14.08% | 10.95% | 17.95% | 16.14% | 10.22% | 12.17% | 9.15% | 8.23% | 8.44% |
Drawdowns
IWB vs. AMOMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWB drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than AMOMX's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWB and AMOMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWB | AMOMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -34.80% | -20.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -12.96% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | -34.80% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.60% | -34.80% | +0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.26% | -9.42% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -6.34% | -4.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.85% | -0.29% |
Volatility
IWB vs. AMOMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is 5.34%, while AQR Large Cap Momentum Style Fund (AMOMX) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that IWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMOMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWB | AMOMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 5.77% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 11.81% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 21.18% | -2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 21.46% | -4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 20.89% | -2.76% |