IVVW vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVVW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Enhanced 1% OTM BuyWrite Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IVVW returned 17.28% vs 22.55% for QYLD. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVVW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

IVVW vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVW achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.89% return.

IVVW

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 4.01%
• 6M: 4.08%
• 1Y: 17.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 7.59%
• 1Y: 22.55%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: 8.26%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVW vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	4.01%	11.71%	12.76%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.89%	9.28%	12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IVVW and QYLD is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024	0.88

The correlation between IVVW and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVVW vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVVW	QYLD
Technology	38.4%	58.7%
Financial Services	11.0%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.8%	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	11.4%
Healthcare	8.4%	3.7%
Industrials	7.9%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	6.4%
Energy	3.2%	0.5%
Utilities	2.1%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.0%

Return for Risk

IVVW vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVW

IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 73
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 84
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVW vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVVW	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.34	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	3.28	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.52	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	4.56	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.95	25.38	-9.43

IVVW vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVW Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVW and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVVW vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVW drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVW and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVVW	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.79%	-24.75%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-4.97%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-2.10%	+0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-3.82%	+2.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	0.89%	+0.20%

Volatility

IVVW vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) is 3.45%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that IVVW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVVW	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.45%	4.78%	-1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.91%	8.50%	-1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.05%	9.70%	-1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.69%	14.84%	-2.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.69%	15.56%	-2.87%

IVVW vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVVW vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

IVVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.86%, more than QYLD's 11.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	19.86%	18.55%	13.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.68%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVVW and QYLD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, IVVW and QYLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IVVW or QYLD?

QYLD has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to IVVW (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVW dropped -16.79% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, IVVW or QYLD?

On 1-year performance, QYLD leads with 22.55% vs 17.28% for IVVW. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVVW or QYLD?

Over the 1-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 22.55% return vs 17.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVVW or QYLD?

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVVW or QYLD?

IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.86%, compared with 11.68% for QYLD.

What is the main difference between IVVW and QYLD?

IVVW is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. IVVW tracks Cboe S&P 500 Enhanced 1% OTM BuyWrite Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IVVW and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.