PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVVW vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVVW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVW achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.90% return.


IVVW

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.90%
YTD
4.84%
6M
6.58%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.84%11.71%12.90%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.90%4.13%4.73%

Correlation

The correlation between IVVW and BUCK is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024

0.10

IVVW vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVVW
BUCK

Technology

35.6%

-

Financial Services

11.8%
100.0%

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

IVVW
35.6%
BUCK

-

Financial Services

IVVW
11.8%
BUCK
100.0%

Communication Services

IVVW
11.2%
BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

IVVW
10.1%
BUCK

-

Healthcare

IVVW
8.5%
BUCK

-

Industrials

IVVW
8.3%
BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

IVVW
4.9%
BUCK

-

Energy

IVVW
3.5%
BUCK

-

Utilities

IVVW
2.4%
BUCK

-

Real Estate

IVVW
1.9%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

IVVW
1.8%
BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVVW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVW
IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVVWBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.54

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

6.11

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.13

32.31

-13.19

IVVW vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVW Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVW and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVVWBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.54

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.47

-0.40

Drawdowns

IVVW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVW drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVW and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVWBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.79%

-5.43%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

-1.31%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.04%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-0.49%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.25%

+0.80%

Volatility

IVVW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that IVVW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVWBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

0.70%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

1.53%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.40%

3.14%

+4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.66%

3.49%

+9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

3.49%

+9.17%

IVVW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVVW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

IVVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.70%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
19.70%18.55%13.72%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVVW and BUCK have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVVW has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVW dropped -16.79% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 20.07% vs 7.95% for BUCK. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.

IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.70%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

IVVW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IVVW and 0.35% for BUCK.

IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVVW and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer