IVV vs. VIG
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.39%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
IVV vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed VIG with an annualized return of 15.39%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.19% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.39%
VIG
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
IVV vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.48% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.11% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and VIG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IVV and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVV vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
VIG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
VIG
Financial Services
IVV
VIG
Communication Services
IVV
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
VIG
Healthcare
IVV
VIG
Industrials
IVV
VIG
Consumer Defensive
IVV
VIG
Energy
IVV
VIG
Utilities
IVV
VIG
Real Estate
IVV
VIG
-
Basic Materials
IVV
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
VIG
IVV vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.34 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 9.39 | +2.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVV vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -46.81% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -7.91% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -14.95% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -20.39% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -31.72% | -2.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.86% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -5.51% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.96% | 0.00% |
Volatility
IVV vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.90%. This indicates that IVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 2.90% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 7.83% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 10.18% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 14.26% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 16.06% | +2.02% |
IVV vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVV vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVV and VIG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to VIG (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.39% vs 13.19% for VIG. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.39% return vs 13.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VIG.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while VIG is Dividend. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.04% for VIG.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer