IVV vs. SCZ
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.62%/yr vs 8.11%/yr for SCZ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCZ.
Performance
IVV vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than SCZ's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 15.62%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.11% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
SCZ
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.11%
IVV vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 11.70% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 10.36% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and SCZ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IVV and SCZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVV vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
SCZ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
SCZ
Financial Services
IVV
SCZ
Communication Services
IVV
SCZ
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
SCZ
Healthcare
IVV
SCZ
Industrials
IVV
SCZ
Consumer Defensive
IVV
SCZ
Energy
IVV
SCZ
Utilities
IVV
SCZ
Real Estate
IVV
SCZ
Basic Materials
IVV
SCZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
SCZ
IVV vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVV | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | 1.66 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | 2.38 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.30 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 2.22 | +1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.97 | 8.51 | +7.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVV | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 1.66 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.32 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.47 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.27 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
IVV vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and SCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -61.86% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -11.43% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -15.06% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -36.87% | +12.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -41.07% | +7.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.08% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -13.07% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.98% | -1.07% |
Volatility
IVV vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 2.75%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 4.60% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 11.95% | -3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.78% | 14.48% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 16.74% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 17.43% | +0.62% |
IVV vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVV vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than SCZ's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 2.99% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVV and SCZ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCZ has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to IVV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs SCZ's -61.86%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.62% vs 8.11% for SCZ. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while SCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.40% for SCZ.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and SCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer