PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVV vs. SCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVV vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than SCZ's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 15.62%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.11% annualized return.


IVV

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.12%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.62%

SCZ

1D
0.27%
1M
2.61%
YTD
10.36%
6M
13.55%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
8.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
11.70%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
10.36%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and SCZ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

0.77

The correlation between IVV and SCZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVV vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVV
SCZ

Technology

35.6%
9.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
12.5%

Communication Services

11.2%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
5.5%

Industrials

8.3%
24.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.0%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.4%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
10.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
10.7%

Technology

IVV
35.6%
SCZ
9.1%

Financial Services

IVV
11.8%
SCZ
12.5%

Communication Services

IVV
11.2%
SCZ
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IVV
10.1%
SCZ
11.8%

Healthcare

IVV
8.5%
SCZ
5.5%

Industrials

IVV
8.3%
SCZ
24.6%

Consumer Defensive

IVV
4.9%
SCZ
5.0%

Energy

IVV
3.5%
SCZ
3.7%

Utilities

IVV
2.4%
SCZ
2.8%

Real Estate

IVV
1.9%
SCZ
10.3%

Basic Materials

IVV
1.8%
SCZ
10.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVV vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVVSCZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.54

1.66

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

2.38

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.30

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.22

+1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.97

8.51

+7.46

IVV vs. SCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the SCZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and SCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVVSCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

1.66

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.32

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.47

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.27

+0.19

Drawdowns

IVV vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and SCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-61.86%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-11.43%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-15.06%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-36.87%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-41.07%

+7.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.08%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-13.07%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.98%

-1.07%

Volatility

IVV vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 2.75%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

4.60%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

11.95%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

14.48%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

16.74%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

17.43%

+0.62%

IVV vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVV vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than SCZ's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
2.99%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVV and SCZ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCZ has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to IVV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs SCZ's -61.86%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.62% vs 8.11% for SCZ. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.

SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while SCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.40% for SCZ.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV and SCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer