IVV vs. RPG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.54%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for RPG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.

Performance

IVV vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 31.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVV having a 15.54% annualized return and RPG not far behind at 14.81%.

IVV

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 10.85%
• 6M: 10.87%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 22.43%
• 5Y*: 13.88%
• 10Y*: 15.54%

RPG

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 11.54%
• YTD: 31.51%
• 6M: 32.14%
• 1Y: 41.04%
• 3Y*: 28.39%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: 14.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	10.85%	17.85%	24.93%	26.31%	-18.16%	28.76%	18.40%	31.07%	-4.49%	21.75%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	31.51%	13.41%	28.23%	8.04%	-27.55%	29.40%	29.34%	28.34%	-4.53%	26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and RPG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2006	0.88

The correlation between IVV and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVV vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVV	RPG
Technology	35.6%	39.6%
Financial Services	11.8%	5.2%
Communication Services	11.2%	8.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	17.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	7.0%
Industrials	8.3%	17.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	1.1%
Energy	3.5%	1.4%
Utilities	2.4%	1.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.5%

Return for Risk

IVV vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV

IVV Risk / Return Rank: 70
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 65
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVV	RPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.09	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	2.82	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.36	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.72	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.71	14.56	+0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVV vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the RPG Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and RPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVV	RPG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	2.09	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.56	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.65	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.54	-0.09

Drawdowns

IVV vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, roughly equal to the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and RPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVV	RPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.25%	-53.27%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-11.08%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.75%	-24.75%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.53%	-35.59%	+11.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.90%	-36.58%	+2.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	0.00%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-8.84%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	2.83%	-0.92%

Volatility

IVV vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 2.87%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVV	RPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	6.43%	-3.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.90%	16.26%	-7.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.80%	19.73%	-7.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	23.44%	-6.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	22.70%	-4.65%

IVV vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVV vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than RPG's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	1.06%	1.17%	1.30%	1.44%	1.66%	1.20%	1.57%	1.85%	2.21%	1.75%	2.01%	2.27%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.17%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVV and RPG in my portfolio?

IVV and RPG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVV or RPG?

RPG has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs RPG's -53.27%.

Which ETF is better, IVV or RPG?

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 14.81% for RPG. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVV or RPG?

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 14.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVV or RPG?

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVV or RPG?

IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.

What is the main difference between IVV and RPG?

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while RPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.35% for RPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.