IVV vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. IVV is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, IVV returned 25.77% vs 27.00% for QQQI. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

IVV vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 10.58% return.

IVV

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -0.85%
• YTD: 9.08%
• 6M: 9.43%
• 1Y: 25.77%
• 3Y*: 20.95%
• 5Y*: 13.42%
• 10Y*: 15.47%

QQQI

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 27.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	9.08%	17.85%	20.87%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.58%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and QQQI is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.93

The correlation between IVV and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVV vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVV	QQQI
Technology	39.0%	58.1%
Financial Services	11.1%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.6%	14.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	11.3%
Healthcare	8.3%	3.9%
Industrials	7.8%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	6.5%
Energy	3.1%	0.5%
Utilities	2.1%	1.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.0%

Return for Risk

IVV vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV

IVV Risk / Return Rank: 70
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 65
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVV	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.84	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.43	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.34	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	2.70	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.43	11.63	+0.81

IVV vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVV vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVV	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.25%	-20.00%	-35.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-9.61%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.35%	-2.69%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-2.21%	-8.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.23%	-0.26%

Volatility

IVV vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 4.37%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVV	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	6.10%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.59%	11.35%	-1.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.28%	14.10%	-1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	17.34%	-0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.08%	17.34%	+0.74%

IVV vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVV vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than QQQI's 13.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	1.08%	1.17%	1.30%	1.44%	1.66%	1.20%	1.57%	1.85%	2.21%	1.75%	2.01%	2.27%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.53%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVV and QQQI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, IVV and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IVV or QQQI?

QQQI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to IVV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, IVV or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 27.00% vs 25.77% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVV or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 27.00% return vs 25.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVV or QQQI?

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVV or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.53%, compared with 1.08% for IVV.

What is the main difference between IVV and QQQI?

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.