IVRA vs. SPHQ
IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. IVRA is actively managed, while SPHQ is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
IVRA vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IVRA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHQ
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 1Y
- 22.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
IVRA vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 11.70% | 10.20% | 13.07% | 9.13% | -10.00% | 32.74% | 1.28% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 14.73% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRA and SPHQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IVRA and SPHQ has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IVRA vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRA
SPHQ
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
IVRA
SPHQ
-
Energy
IVRA
SPHQ
Basic Materials
IVRA
SPHQ
Utilities
IVRA
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
IVRA
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
IVRA
SPHQ
Financial Services
IVRA
SPHQ
Communication Services
IVRA
-
SPHQ
Healthcare
IVRA
-
SPHQ
Industrials
IVRA
-
SPHQ
Technology
IVRA
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRA vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
IVRA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPHQ
IVRA vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRA | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRA vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRA | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -57.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.02% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.65% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.19% | — |
Volatility
IVRA vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRA | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.22% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.72% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.94% | — |
IVRA vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRA vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.80% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.09% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRA and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.80%, compared with 1.09% for SPHQ.
IVRA is categorized as ESG, while SPHQ is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.15% for SPHQ.
Find the right allocation for IVRA and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer