IVRA vs. ISCMF
IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. IVRA is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRA returned 15.46%/yr vs 15.20%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
IVRA vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRA achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
IVRA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVRA vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 11.70% | 10.20% | 13.07% | 9.13% | -11.45% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRA and ISCMF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | -0.01 |
The correlation between IVRA and ISCMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRA vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
IVRA
ISCMF
IVRA vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVRA | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 2.53 | -1.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 6.69 | -3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 15.68 | -3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVRA | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 2.05 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.45 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
IVRA vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRA drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, roughly equal to the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRA and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRA | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -25.42% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -5.69% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.03% | -7.62% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -5.26% | +4.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.27% | -13.43% | +6.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 2.42% | -1.10% |
Volatility
IVRA vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) is 0.00%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that IVRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRA | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 7.14% | -7.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.45% | 15.90% | -10.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.27% | 18.53% | -9.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 14.38% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 14.38% | +2.01% |
IVRA vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRA vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
IVRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.99%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.99% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRA and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISCMF has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to IVRA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRA dropped -25.99% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, IVRA leads with 15.46% vs 15.20% for ISCMF. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IVRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IVRA has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 15.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.99%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
IVRA is categorized as ESG, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRA and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer