IVRA vs. BLDG

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

IVRA vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IVRA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BLDG

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.54%
• 6M: 11.05%
• YTD: 15.36%
• 1Y: 16.55%
• 3Y*: 10.03%
• 5Y*: 3.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	$86.39K	$91.10K	$929.62K

IVRA vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	11.70%	10.20%	13.07%	9.13%	-10.00%	32.74%	1.28%
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	15.36%	4.26%	8.18%	1.76%	-14.66%	22.47%	1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRA and BLDG is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between IVRA and BLDG has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

IVRA vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLDG

BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 55
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRA vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVRA	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.65	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.81	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IVRA	BLDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-27.25%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.08%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-9.01%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IVRA	BLDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.73%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.56%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.62%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.23%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.51%	—

IVRA vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IVRA and BLDG have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

IVRA vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	5.09%	7.46%	7.97%	4.99%	3.99%	10.40%	0.59%
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	16.54%	5.68%	3.71%	2.47%	2.30%	3.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVRA and BLDG in my portfolio?

IVRA and BLDG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IVRA or BLDG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVRA or BLDG?

IVRA and BLDG have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVRA or BLDG?

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.54%, compared with 5.09% for BLDG.

What is the main difference between IVRA and BLDG?

IVRA is categorized as ESG, while BLDG is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria.