IVOV vs. IWS
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - IVOV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while IWS tracks the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOV returned 10.41%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for IWS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
IVOV vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 15.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOV having a 10.41% annualized return and IWS not far behind at 10.23%.
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
IWS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 15.06%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
IVOV vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 8.98% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 15.06% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and IWS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IVOV and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOV vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOV
IWS
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IVOV
IWS
Industrials
IVOV
IWS
Consumer Cyclical
IVOV
IWS
Real Estate
IVOV
IWS
Technology
IVOV
IWS
Energy
IVOV
IWS
Basic Materials
IVOV
IWS
Consumer Defensive
IVOV
IWS
Utilities
IVOV
IWS
Healthcare
IVOV
IWS
Communication Services
IVOV
IWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
IWS
IVOV vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOV | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 2.06 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 2.95 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 3.60 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 13.59 | -6.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOV | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.06 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.49 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.53 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.42 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -62.40% | +16.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -7.53% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | -20.57% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -21.23% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | -43.83% | -2.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.04% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -8.02% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 1.99% | +1.08% |
Volatility
IVOV vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 3.40%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 3.40% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.61% | 9.57% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 13.19% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 17.30% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 19.36% | +2.37% |
IVOV vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOV vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than IWS's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IVOV and IWS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to IWS (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 10-year performance, IVOV leads with 10.41% vs 10.23% for IWS. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.
IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.34% for IWS.
IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.23% for IWS.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer