PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 19.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOV having a 10.61% annualized return and IWS not far behind at 10.30%.


IVOV

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.84%
6M
8.73%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
11.75%

IWS

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.62%
6M
14.40%
YTD
19.19%
1Y
27.66%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
10.30%
ALL TIME*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$975.54K$1.11M$1.64M
$90.38M$82.14M$73.71M

IVOV vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
13.17%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
19.19%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and IWS is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.91

The correlation between IVOV and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOV vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
IWS

Financial Services

21.8%
16.3%

Industrials

19.2%
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
8.5%

Technology

10.3%
13.3%

Real Estate

9.5%
8.7%

Energy

6.3%
7.1%

Basic Materials

5.7%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.7%

Utilities

4.0%
7.2%

Healthcare

3.8%
9.9%

Communication Services

0.8%
2.4%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.8%
IWS
16.3%

Industrials

IVOV
19.2%
IWS
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.9%
IWS
8.5%

Technology

IVOV
10.3%
IWS
13.3%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.5%
IWS
8.7%

Energy

IVOV
6.3%
IWS
7.1%

Basic Materials

IVOV
5.7%
IWS
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
4.8%
IWS
5.7%

Utilities

IVOV
4.0%
IWS
7.2%

Healthcare

IVOV
3.8%
IWS
9.9%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.8%
IWS
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVOV vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVOVIWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

3.47

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

13.35

-6.30

IVOV vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and IWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-62.40%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-7.53%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-20.57%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-21.23%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-43.83%

-2.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.38%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-7.97%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

1.95%

+1.02%

Volatility

IVOV vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 2.96%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

2.96%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

9.98%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

13.46%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

17.26%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

19.30%

+2.35%

IVOV vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOV vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than IWS's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.61%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.30%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IVOV and IWS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVOV has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to IWS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs IWS's -62.40%.

On 10-year performance, IVOV leads with 10.61% vs 10.30% for IWS. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 10.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.30% for IWS.

IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.23% for IWS.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and IWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer