IVOV vs. BND
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOV returned 10.41%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for BND. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
IVOV vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOV has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 10.41%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
BND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
IVOV vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 8.98% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.27% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and BND is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | -0.08 |
The correlation between IVOV and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
BND
IVOV vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOV | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.92 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 5.80 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOV | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.01 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.29 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.59 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -18.58% | -27.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -2.68% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | -5.92% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -17.91% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | -18.58% | -27.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -2.37% | +2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -3.06% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 0.88% | +2.19% |
Volatility
IVOV vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.23%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 1.23% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.61% | 2.66% | +7.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 3.78% | +11.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 6.02% | +13.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 5.53% | +16.20% |
IVOV vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOV vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than BND's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOV and BND have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 10-year performance, IVOV leads with 10.41% vs 1.58% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 1.67% for IVOV.
IVOV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.03% for BND.
IVOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer