IVOO vs. BMVP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IVOO (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF) and BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - IVOO tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index while BMVP tracks the Bloomberg MVP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOO returned 11.59%/yr vs 9.67%/yr for BMVP. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BMVP.

Performance

IVOO vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly higher than BMVP's 5.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOO has outperformed BMVP with an annualized return of 11.59%, while BMVP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.

IVOO

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 2.69%
• YTD: 14.65%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 25.18%
• 3Y*: 16.08%
• 5Y*: 8.44%
• 10Y*: 11.59%

BMVP

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: 5.50%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 8.55%
• 3Y*: 13.17%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: 9.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOO vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF	14.65%	7.47%	13.77%	16.45%	-13.17%	24.61%	13.61%	26.18%	-11.33%	16.38%
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	5.50%	6.15%	17.46%	19.03%	-16.01%	19.38%	8.52%	13.47%	-6.40%	20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOO and BMVP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010	0.85

The correlation between IVOO and BMVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVOO vs. BMVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVOO	BMVP
Industrials	24.7%	16.6%
Technology	17.8%	17.2%
Financial Services	13.7%	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	10.6%
Healthcare	9.0%	9.7%
Real Estate	7.3%	5.4%
Energy	4.9%	5.1%
Basic Materials	4.8%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	5.0%
Utilities	2.9%	5.1%
Communication Services	1.0%	7.5%

Return for Risk

IVOO vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOO

IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 53
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

BMVP

BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 26
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOO vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVOO	BMVP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	0.88	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	1.31	+1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.15	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	1.33	+1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.47	3.99	+6.48

IVOO vs. BMVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the BMVP Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOO and BMVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVOO vs. BMVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum BMVP drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and BMVP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVOO	BMVP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.33%	-78.13%	+35.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.81%	-6.45%	-2.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.22%	-15.12%	-9.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.22%	-26.58%	+2.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.33%	-39.45%	-2.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-2.69%	+1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.25%	-36.13%	+30.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.15%	+0.26%

Volatility

IVOO vs. BMVP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) at 2.87%. This indicates that IVOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVOO	BMVP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.73%	2.87%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.77%	7.29%	+4.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.89%	9.86%	+6.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.74%	16.03%	+3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.19%	18.79%	+2.40%

IVOO vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVOO vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison

IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than BMVP's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	1.80%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF	1.19%	1.35%	1.30%	1.25%	1.58%	1.14%	1.23%	1.49%	1.56%	1.22%	1.37%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVOO and BMVP in my portfolio?

IVOO and BMVP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVOO or BMVP?

IVOO has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to BMVP (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs BMVP's -78.13%.

Which ETF is better, IVOO or BMVP?

On 10-year performance, IVOO leads with 11.59% vs 9.67% for BMVP. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVOO or BMVP?

Over the 10-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVOO or BMVP?

IVOO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BMVP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVOO or BMVP?

BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.19% for IVOO.

What is the main difference between IVOO and BMVP?

IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IVOO and 0.29% for BMVP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.