IVOL vs. MTBA
IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC, while MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IVOL returned -7.79% vs 4.40% for MTBA. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVOL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTBA.
Performance
IVOL vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -7.64% return, which is significantly lower than MTBA's 0.02% return.
IVOL
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -6.37%
- YTD
- -7.64%
- 1Y
- -7.79%
- 3Y*
- -2.49%
- 5Y*
- -5.56%
- 10Y*
- —
MTBA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -7.64% | 11.97% | -11.07% | 0.12% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 0.02% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOL and MTBA is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOL vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank
IVOL
MTBA
IVOL vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.27 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 1.57 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 4.68 | -6.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVOL vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and MTBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -3.48% | -27.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.08% | -2.82% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.36% | -1.36% | -26.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -0.81% | -12.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 0.94% | +4.79% |
Volatility
IVOL vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison
Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 1.01%. This indicates that IVOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 1.01% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.00% | 2.67% | +2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.74% | 3.12% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.85% | 3.93% | +8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 3.93% | +8.01% |
IVOL vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOL vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison
IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than MTBA's 6.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.92% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.06% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOL and MTBA have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOL has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to MTBA (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs MTBA's -3.48%.
On 1-year performance, MTBA leads with 4.40% vs -7.79% for IVOL. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTBA has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MTBA has performed better with a 4.40% return vs -7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 3.92% for IVOL.
IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while MTBA is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.15% for MTBA.
MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOL and MTBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer