IVOL vs. MTBA
IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC, while MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IVOL returned -5.59% vs 5.18% for MTBA. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVOL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTBA.
Performance
IVOL vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -6.33% return, which is significantly lower than MTBA's -0.23% return.
IVOL
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- -6.33%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- -5.59%
- 3Y*
- -3.54%
- 5Y*
- -5.77%
- 10Y*
- —
MTBA
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -6.33% | 11.97% | -11.07% | -0.22% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.23% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOL and MTBA is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | 0.39 |
IVOL vs. MTBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOL
MTBA
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IVOL
MTBA
Basic Materials
IVOL
-
MTBA
-
Communication Services
IVOL
-
MTBA
-
Consumer Cyclical
IVOL
-
MTBA
-
Consumer Defensive
IVOL
-
MTBA
-
Energy
IVOL
-
MTBA
-
Healthcare
IVOL
-
MTBA
-
Industrials
IVOL
-
MTBA
-
Real Estate
IVOL
-
MTBA
-
Technology
IVOL
-
MTBA
-
Utilities
IVOL
-
MTBA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOL vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank
IVOL
MTBA
IVOL vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.32 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 1.84 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 6.28 | -7.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 | 1.68 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 1.30 | -1.41 |
Drawdowns
IVOL vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and MTBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -3.48% | -27.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -2.82% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.33% | -1.60% | -24.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -0.79% | -12.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 0.83% | +3.55% |
Volatility
IVOL vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) is 1.07%, while Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that IVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOL | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.33% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.44% | 2.47% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.89% | 3.10% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 3.95% | +8.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 3.95% | +8.04% |
IVOL vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOL vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison
IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than MTBA's 6.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.89% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.09% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOL and MTBA have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTBA has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to IVOL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs MTBA's -3.48%.
On 1-year performance, MTBA leads with 5.18% vs -5.59% for IVOL. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MTBA has performed better with a 5.18% return vs -5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 3.89% for IVOL.
IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while MTBA is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.15% for MTBA.
MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOL and MTBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer