PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOL vs. KGRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOL vs. KGRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -6.33% return, which is significantly lower than KGRN's 0.89% return.


IVOL

1D
-0.34%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
-6.33%
6M
-7.21%
1Y
-5.59%
3Y*
-3.54%
5Y*
-5.77%
10Y*

KGRN

1D
-2.40%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
0.89%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
2.74%
5Y*
-7.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOL vs. KGRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IVOL
Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF
-6.33%11.97%-11.07%-5.18%-12.69%-0.31%14.56%3.23%
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
0.89%21.45%-1.11%-14.75%-40.45%5.91%138.49%7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOL and KGRN is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2019

-0.01

IVOL vs. KGRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOL
KGRN

Financial Services

77.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

36.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

3.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

26.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

11.6%

Utilities

-

21.2%

Financial Services

IVOL
77.1%
KGRN

-

Basic Materials

IVOL

-

KGRN

-

Communication Services

IVOL

-

KGRN

-

Consumer Cyclical

IVOL

-

KGRN
36.8%

Consumer Defensive

IVOL

-

KGRN

-

Energy

IVOL

-

KGRN
3.6%

Healthcare

IVOL

-

KGRN

-

Industrials

IVOL

-

KGRN
26.5%

Real Estate

IVOL

-

KGRN

-

Technology

IVOL

-

KGRN
11.6%

Utilities

IVOL

-

KGRN
21.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOL vs. KGRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOL
IVOL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

KGRN
KGRN Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
KGRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGRN Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
KGRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOL vs. KGRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOLKGRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.07

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

0.39

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

0.67

-1.95

IVOL vs. KGRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOL Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the KGRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOL and KGRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOLKGRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

0.29

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

-0.22

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.07

-0.18

Drawdowns

IVOL vs. KGRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, smaller than the maximum KGRN drawdown of -66.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and KGRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOLKGRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.16%

-66.24%

+35.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-17.26%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.63%

-42.19%

+25.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.62%

-63.60%

+32.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.33%

-47.17%

+20.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

-33.95%

+20.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

10.08%

-5.70%

Volatility

IVOL vs. KGRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) is 1.07%, while KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that IVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOLKGRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

7.47%

-6.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.44%

15.12%

-10.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.89%

23.07%

-16.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.84%

34.75%

-21.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.99%

32.86%

-20.87%

IVOL vs. KGRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KGRN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVOL vs. KGRN - Dividend Comparison

IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than KGRN's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IVOL
Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF
3.89%3.61%3.83%3.73%3.92%3.93%3.44%2.02%0.00%
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
0.85%0.85%1.49%0.74%1.98%0.41%0.01%5.88%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOL and KGRN have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KGRN has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to IVOL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs KGRN's -66.24%.

On 5-year performance, IVOL leads with -5.77% vs -7.68% for KGRN. On fees, KGRN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVOL has performed better with a -5.77% return vs -7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KGRN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.

IVOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 0.85% for KGRN.

IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while KGRN is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.79% for KGRN.

KGRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOL and KGRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer