PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOG vs. SMMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOG vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IVOG having a 18.93% return and SMMD slightly higher at 19.12%.


IVOG

1D
0.64%
1M
5.56%
YTD
18.93%
6M
19.48%
1Y
31.58%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
11.58%

SMMD

1D
0.89%
1M
4.71%
YTD
19.12%
6M
20.39%
1Y
38.73%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOG vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
18.93%7.34%15.62%17.36%-19.08%18.85%22.60%26.13%-10.58%10.09%
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
19.12%11.72%11.87%17.71%-18.53%18.30%19.98%28.01%-10.58%10.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOG and SMMD is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017

0.92

The correlation between IVOG and SMMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOG vs. SMMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOG
SMMD

Industrials

30.9%
21.0%

Technology

21.9%
18.8%

Healthcare

13.5%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
10.6%

Financial Services

7.3%
13.8%

Real Estate

5.5%
6.7%

Energy

3.7%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.6%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
2.8%

Utilities

2.0%
2.7%

Communication Services

1.5%
2.5%

Industrials

IVOG
30.9%
SMMD
21.0%

Technology

IVOG
21.9%
SMMD
18.8%

Healthcare

IVOG
13.5%
SMMD
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOG
8.0%
SMMD
10.6%

Financial Services

IVOG
7.3%
SMMD
13.8%

Real Estate

IVOG
5.5%
SMMD
6.7%

Energy

IVOG
3.7%
SMMD
4.9%

Basic Materials

IVOG
3.6%
SMMD
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

IVOG
2.1%
SMMD
2.8%

Utilities

IVOG
2.0%
SMMD
2.7%

Communication Services

IVOG
1.5%
SMMD
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOG vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOG
IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMD
SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOG vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOGSMMDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

2.26

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

3.14

-0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

4.02

-0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.59

15.37

-2.78

IVOG vs. SMMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the SMMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOG and SMMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOGSMMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.26

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.38

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.50

+0.14

Drawdowns

IVOG vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOG drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, roughly equal to the maximum SMMD drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOG and SMMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOGSMMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-41.06%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-9.66%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.61%

-25.50%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-28.26%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-8.38%

+2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.53%

-0.07%

Volatility

IVOG vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOGSMMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

5.13%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

12.60%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

17.18%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

20.82%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

22.37%

-1.78%

IVOG vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IVOG and SMMD have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOG vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison

IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SMMD's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
0.54%0.64%0.79%1.15%1.05%0.47%0.74%1.17%1.01%0.93%1.11%1.04%
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
1.05%1.28%1.27%1.44%1.79%1.12%1.31%1.50%2.45%0.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IVOG and SMMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVOG has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to SMMD (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOG dropped -39.32% vs SMMD's -41.06%.

On 5-year performance, IVOG leads with 8.75% vs 7.89% for SMMD. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVOG has performed better with a 8.75% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOG and SMMD have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

SMMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.54% for IVOG.

IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.

SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOG and SMMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer