IVNQX vs. MLPOX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

IVNQX (Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund) and MLPOX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund) are both mutual funds - IVNQX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Invesco, while MLPOX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Invesco. Over the past 5 years, IVNQX returned 15.16%/yr vs 23.17%/yr for MLPOX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVNQX charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for MLPOX.

Performance

IVNQX vs. MLPOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVNQX achieves a 16.09% return, which is significantly lower than MLPOX's 21.28% return.

IVNQX

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: 13.88%
• YTD: 16.09%
• 1Y: 28.44%
• 3Y*: 24.00%
• 5Y*: 15.16%
• 10Y*: —

MLPOX

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 2.36%
• 6M: 18.63%
• YTD: 21.28%
• 1Y: 22.07%
• 3Y*: 25.22%
• 5Y*: 23.17%
• 10Y*: 9.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVNQX vs. MLPOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IVNQX Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund	16.09%	20.77%	25.43%	54.62%	-32.05%	26.75%	8.46%
MLPOX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund	21.28%	4.47%	40.63%	20.44%	29.45%	39.81%	16.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IVNQX and MLPOX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020	0.26

The correlation between IVNQX and MLPOX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IVNQX vs. MLPOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVNQX

IVNQX Risk / Return Rank: 51
IVNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
IVNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
IVNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IVNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
IVNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

MLPOX

MLPOX Risk / Return Rank: 74
MLPOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MLPOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
MLPOX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MLPOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MLPOX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVNQX vs. MLPOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVNQX	MLPOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.95	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.71	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	3.87	-1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.74	9.29	-0.56

IVNQX vs. MLPOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVNQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the MLPOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVNQX and MLPOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVNQX vs. MLPOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVNQX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, smaller than the maximum MLPOX drawdown of -76.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVNQX and MLPOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVNQX	MLPOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.83%	-76.99%	+42.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.95%	-5.93%	-6.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.70%	-15.18%	-7.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.83%	-21.17%	-13.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.51%	-1.35%	-3.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.13%	-16.34%	+8.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	2.46%	+0.86%

Volatility

IVNQX vs. MLPOX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) at 4.41%. This indicates that IVNQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVNQX	MLPOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.41%	4.41%	+4.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.25%	9.08%	+6.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.60%	11.78%	+6.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.88%	19.28%	+3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.58%	25.96%	-3.38%

IVNQX vs. MLPOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVNQX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPOX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVNQX vs. MLPOX - Dividend Comparison

IVNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than MLPOX's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVNQX Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund	1.13%	1.31%	0.72%	0.54%	0.73%	0.84%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPOX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund	4.77%	5.31%	4.26%	5.55%	6.19%	7.52%	13.39%	10.42%	10.08%	8.00%	7.18%	7.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVNQX and MLPOX in my portfolio?

IVNQX and MLPOX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVNQX or MLPOX?

IVNQX has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to MLPOX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVNQX dropped -34.83% vs MLPOX's -76.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLPOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.