PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVLU vs. RODM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVLU vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 16.70% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 14.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 11.37%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.11% annualized return.


IVLU

1D
0.32%
1M
3.19%
6M
8.70%
YTD
16.70%
1Y
37.44%
3Y*
24.12%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
11.37%
ALL TIME*
8.80%

RODM

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.46%
6M
9.28%
YTD
14.35%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
9.11%
ALL TIME*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$36.81M$33.42M$39.54M
$2.55M$3.01M$3.76M

IVLU vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
16.70%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
14.35%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IVLU and RODM is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.85

The correlation between IVLU and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVLU vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVLU
RODM

Financial Services

29.4%
27.2%

Industrials

17.2%
17.0%

Healthcare

9.8%
9.7%

Technology

8.8%
6.9%

Basic Materials

7.2%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
8.1%

Energy

5.6%
5.4%

Utilities

3.6%
5.2%

Communication Services

3.4%
5.5%

Real Estate

1.4%
3.5%

Financial Services

IVLU
29.4%
RODM
27.2%

Industrials

IVLU
17.2%
RODM
17.0%

Healthcare

IVLU
9.8%
RODM
9.7%

Technology

IVLU
8.8%
RODM
6.9%

Basic Materials

IVLU
7.2%
RODM
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IVLU
7.1%
RODM
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

IVLU
6.0%
RODM
8.1%

Energy

IVLU
5.6%
RODM
5.4%

Utilities

IVLU
3.6%
RODM
5.2%

Communication Services

IVLU
3.4%
RODM
5.5%

Real Estate

IVLU
1.4%
RODM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVLU vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVLU vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVLURODMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.77

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

15.17

-2.86

IVLU vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVLU and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVLU vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and RODM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVLURODMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-35.98%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.69%

-7.10%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-10.58%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-28.85%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

-35.98%

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.57%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-6.30%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

1.76%

+1.29%

Volatility

IVLU vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.07%. This indicates that IVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVLURODMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

3.07%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

8.91%

+4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

10.86%

+4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

13.46%

+3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

14.96%

+2.43%

IVLU vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVLU vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than RODM's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
3.22%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.79%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IVLU and RODM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVLU has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to RODM (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs RODM's -35.98%.

On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.37% vs 9.11% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 9.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.79% for RODM.

IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.29% for RODM.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVLU and RODM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer