IVGTX vs. LVAFX
IVGTX (VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio) and LVAFX (LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IVGTX returned 7.31%/yr vs 7.86%/yr for LVAFX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVGTX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for LVAFX.
Performance
IVGTX vs. LVAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVGTX achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly lower than LVAFX's 12.87% return. Over the past 10 years, IVGTX has underperformed LVAFX with an annualized return of 7.31%, while LVAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.86% annualized return.
IVGTX
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- YTD
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- -13.19%
- 3Y*
- 0.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
LVAFX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
IVGTX vs. LVAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVGTX VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio | -8.22% | 0.16% | 8.63% | 16.01% | -17.63% | 21.67% | 13.17% | 29.34% | -2.81% | 25.90% |
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 12.87% | 22.33% | 0.10% | 9.81% | -4.04% | 17.36% | -5.16% | 17.54% | -6.47% | 18.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVGTX and LVAFX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IVGTX and LVAFX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVGTX vs. LVAFX — Risk / Return Rank
IVGTX
LVAFX
IVGTX vs. LVAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio (IVGTX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVGTX | LVAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.53 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 4.21 | -4.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 14.56 | -15.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVGTX vs. LVAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVGTX drawdown since its inception was -44.75%, which is greater than LVAFX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVGTX and LVAFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVGTX | LVAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.75% | -33.69% | -11.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.45% | -5.76% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.45% | -17.52% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.27% | -18.34% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.16% | -33.69% | +3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.69% | -0.94% | -13.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -4.72% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.05% | 1.66% | +9.39% |
Volatility
IVGTX vs. LVAFX - Volatility Comparison
VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio (IVGTX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) at 2.59%. This indicates that IVGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVGTX | LVAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 2.59% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 6.57% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 8.64% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 13.24% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 13.52% | +2.88% |
IVGTX vs. LVAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVGTX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LVAFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVGTX vs. LVAFX - Dividend Comparison
IVGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.59%, more than LVAFX's 9.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVGTX VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio | 68.59% | 42.80% | 10.28% | 8.24% | 10.69% | 8.69% | 8.32% | 11.20% | 17.80% | 7.06% | 10.12% | 14.63% |
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 9.01% | 10.17% | 2.71% | 15.64% | 2.90% | 2.90% | 2.14% | 7.62% | 3.59% | 7.10% | 1.66% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVGTX and LVAFX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVGTX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to LVAFX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVGTX dropped -44.75% vs LVAFX's -33.69%.
LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVGTX and LVAFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer