PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVGTX vs. IIRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVGTX vs. IIRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio (IVGTX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVGTX achieves a -8.38% return, which is significantly lower than IIRLX's 11.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IVGTX has underperformed IIRLX with an annualized return of 7.48%, while IIRLX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.21% annualized return.


IVGTX

1D
0.69%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
-8.38%
6M
-7.63%
1Y
-14.33%
3Y*
2.31%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
7.48%

IIRLX

1D
0.30%
1M
5.78%
YTD
11.03%
6M
11.26%
1Y
30.13%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
16.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVGTX vs. IIRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVGTX
VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio
-8.38%0.16%8.63%16.01%-17.63%21.67%13.17%29.34%-2.81%25.90%
IIRLX
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio
11.03%18.77%26.95%29.41%-20.07%27.26%21.71%31.18%-3.45%22.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IVGTX and IIRLX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2008

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between IVGTX and IIRLX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVGTX vs. IIRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVGTX
IVGTX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IVGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
IVGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

IIRLX
IIRLX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IIRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IIRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVGTX vs. IIRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio (IVGTX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVGTXIIRLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.30

2.57

-3.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.77

3.59

-5.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.48

-0.68

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

5.17

-5.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.56

23.31

-23.87

IVGTX vs. IIRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVGTX Sharpe Ratio is -1.30, which is lower than the IIRLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVGTX and IIRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVGTXIIRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.30

2.57

-3.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.85

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.89

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.62

-0.08

Drawdowns

IVGTX vs. IIRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVGTX drawdown since its inception was -44.75%, smaller than the maximum IIRLX drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVGTX and IIRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVGTXIIRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.75%

-50.33%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.45%

-9.83%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.45%

-19.58%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.27%

-25.83%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.16%

-32.60%

+2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.84%

0.00%

-14.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-6.78%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.45%

2.18%

+7.27%

Volatility

IVGTX vs. IIRLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio (IVGTX) is 2.71%, while Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that IVGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IIRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVGTXIIRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

6.14%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

10.67%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

13.58%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.08%

17.77%

-1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

18.52%

-2.06%

IVGTX vs. IIRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVGTX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IIRLX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVGTX vs. IIRLX - Dividend Comparison

IVGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.71%, more than IIRLX's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IIRLX
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio
4.77%3.76%0.96%1.14%5.04%4.77%4.71%4.35%1.73%1.47%1.77%1.66%
IVGTX
VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio
46.71%42.80%10.28%8.24%10.69%8.69%8.32%11.20%17.80%7.06%10.12%14.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVGTX and IIRLX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IIRLX has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to IVGTX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVGTX dropped -44.75% vs IIRLX's -50.33%.

IIRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVGTX and IIRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer