IVES vs. STHH
IVES (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds - IVES tracks the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index while STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IVES returned 35.69% vs 147.03% for STHH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVES charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.
Performance
IVES vs. STHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVES achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 184.91% return.
IVES
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 14.36%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 35.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 184.91%
- 6M
- 183.51%
- 1Y
- 147.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVES vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 14.36% | 25.11% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 184.91% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVES and STHH is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between IVES and STHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVES vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank
IVES
STHH
IVES vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVES | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.45 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 4.37 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 9.88 | -5.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVES vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVES drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, smaller than the maximum STHH drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVES and STHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVES | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.64% | -33.89% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.64% | -33.89% | +11.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.37% | -9.01% | -4.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -10.17% | +4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.32% | 14.94% | -6.62% |
Volatility
IVES vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) is 11.81%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 25.53%. This indicates that IVES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVES | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | 25.53% | -13.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.22% | 41.17% | -19.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.13% | 52.69% | -25.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 51.44% | -24.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 51.44% | -24.79% |
IVES vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVES has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVES vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison
IVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than STHH's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 0.36% | 0.41% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVES and STHH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STHH has higher volatility (25.53%) compared to IVES (11.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVES dropped -22.64% vs STHH's -33.89%.
On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 147.03% vs 35.69% for IVES. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IVES has been the lower-risk option at 11.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 147.03% return vs 35.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.
STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.36% for IVES.
IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index, while STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVES and 0.19% for STHH.
STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVES and STHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer