PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVEP vs. SEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVEP vs. SEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IVEP

1D
-2.80%
1M
-7.80%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SEA

1D
-0.36%
1M
3.02%
6M
18.25%
YTD
24.79%
1Y
33.01%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVEP vs. SEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IVEP and SEA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026

0.22

IVEP vs. SEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVEP
SEA

Industrials

43.6%
89.6%

Utilities

22.5%

-

Energy

13.0%
8.4%

Real Estate

10.9%

-

Technology

7.7%
0.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%

-

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

IVEP
43.6%
SEA
89.6%

Utilities

IVEP
22.5%
SEA

-

Energy

IVEP
13.0%
SEA
8.4%

Real Estate

IVEP
10.9%
SEA

-

Technology

IVEP
7.7%
SEA
0.1%

Basic Materials

IVEP
2.4%
SEA

-

Communication Services

IVEP

-

SEA
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IVEP

-

SEA

-

Consumer Defensive

IVEP

-

SEA

-

Financial Services

IVEP

-

SEA

-

Healthcare

IVEP

-

SEA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVEP vs. SEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SEA
SEA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVEP vs. SEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVEPSEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.32

IVEP vs. SEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVEP vs. SEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVEP drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum SEA drawdown of -39.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVEP and SEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVEPSEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-39.53%

+27.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.17%

-0.36%

-11.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-14.03%

+10.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

Volatility

IVEP vs. SEA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVEPSEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.12%

17.09%

+12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.12%

21.62%

+7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.12%

21.62%

+7.50%

IVEP vs. SEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVEP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SEA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVEP vs. SEA - Dividend Comparison

IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IVEP
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
5.41%6.76%18.47%9.85%18.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVEP and SEA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SEA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.

SEA has the higher dividend yield at 5.41%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.

IVEP tracks Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index, while SEA tracks U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and US Global. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVEP and 0.60% for SEA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVEP and SEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer