IVAL vs. QMOM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IVAL (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF) and QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVAL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while QMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVAL returned 8.16%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for QMOM. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVAL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QMOM.

Performance

IVAL vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than QMOM's 12.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IVAL has underperformed QMOM with an annualized return of 8.16%, while QMOM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.

IVAL

• 1D: -2.03%
• 1M: 4.21%
• 6M: 9.40%
• YTD: 16.85%
• 1Y: 34.16%
• 3Y*: 18.08%
• 5Y*: 9.92%
• 10Y*: 8.16%
• ALL TIME*: 6.66%

QMOM

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -2.80%
• 6M: 8.63%
• YTD: 12.94%
• 1Y: 17.87%
• 3Y*: 17.31%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: 12.30%
• ALL TIME*: 12.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	$389.83K	$422.74K	$617.49K
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	$1.43M	$1.49M	$2.25M

IVAL vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	16.85%	34.92%	-0.71%	20.61%	-10.06%	-0.22%	-4.94%	21.26%	-22.50%	31.03%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	12.94%	2.36%	30.43%	9.50%	-6.99%	-4.06%	61.94%	28.39%	-11.75%	15.92%

Correlation

The correlation between IVAL and QMOM is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.51

The correlation between IVAL and QMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVAL vs. QMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVAL	QMOM
Industrials	22.0%	24.6%
Consumer Cyclical	21.7%	5.8%
Basic Materials	17.9%	13.5%
Energy	14.2%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	10.2%	2.0%
Technology	6.1%	20.4%
Healthcare	4.1%	17.9%
Communication Services	4.0%	2.0%
Financial Services	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

IVAL vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVAL

IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 86
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

QMOM

QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 31
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 27
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVAL vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVAL	QMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	0.63	+1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	1.03	+2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.13	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	1.27	+1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.25	3.80	+6.45

IVAL vs. QMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the QMOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVAL and QMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVAL vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than QMOM's maximum drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and QMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVAL	QMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.09%	-39.13%	-6.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.24%	-12.76%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.92%	-26.46%	+11.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.51%	-26.82%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.09%	-39.13%	-6.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.03%	-9.73%	+7.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.88%	-12.83%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	4.26%	-0.82%

Volatility

IVAL vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) is 4.97%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that IVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVAL	QMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.97%	7.59%	-2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.96%	22.16%	-9.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.53%	25.74%	-10.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.78%	24.46%	-6.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.61%	26.72%	-8.11%

IVAL vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVAL vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison

IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than QMOM's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	2.61%	2.75%	3.60%	5.15%	8.00%	3.95%	2.07%	2.51%	2.93%	1.73%	2.02%	1.86%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	0.48%	0.54%	1.40%	0.87%	1.59%	0.12%	0.08%	0.01%	0.05%	0.13%	0.34%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVAL and QMOM in my portfolio?

IVAL and QMOM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVAL or QMOM?

QMOM has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to IVAL (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs QMOM's -39.13%.

Which ETF is better, IVAL or QMOM?

On 10-year performance, QMOM leads with 12.30% vs 8.16% for IVAL. On fees, QMOM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, IVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVAL or QMOM?

Over the 10-year period, QMOM has performed better with a 12.30% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVAL or QMOM?

QMOM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVAL or QMOM?

IVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.48% for QMOM.

What is the main difference between IVAL and QMOM?

IVAL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QMOM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.28% for QMOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.